- #Boycott advance auto parts full#
- #Boycott advance auto parts trial#
- #Boycott advance auto parts free#
#Boycott advance auto parts full#
This was the case in the FTC's action against a national toy retailer that obtained parallel agreements from several toy manufacturers not to supply low-priced "club" stores with a full range of toys.
FTC cases have involved a group of physicians charged with using a boycott to prevent a managed care organization from establishing a competing health care facility and retailers who used a boycott to force manufacturers to limit sales through a competing catalog vendor.īoycotts targeting "price cutters" are especially likely to raise antitrust concerns, and may be achieved with the help of a common dealer or supplier. 411(1990).īoycotts to prevent a firm from entering a market or to disadvantage an existing competitor are also illegal. The Supreme Court upheld the FTC's ruling in this case.
#Boycott advance auto parts trial#
The FTC also successfully challenged the group boycott of an association of competing trial lawyers to stop providing legal services to the District of Columbia for indigent criminal defendants until the District increased the fees it paid for those services. For a description of these actions, read the Overview of FTC Antitrust Actions in Health Care Services and Products. An independent decision not to offer services at prevailing prices does not raise antitrust concerns, but an agreement among competitors not to offer services at prevailing prices as a means of achieving an agreed-upon (and typically higher) price does raise antitrust concerns.Įxample: The FTC has challenged the actions of several groups of competing health care providers, such as doctors, charging that their refusal to deal with insurers or other purchasers on other than jointly-agreed upon terms amounted to an illegal group boycott. In this scenario, the competitors agree not to do business with others except on agreed-upon terms, typically with the result of raising prices. For instance, a group boycott may be used to implement an illegal price-fixing agreement. About the FTC Show/hide About the FTC menu itemsĪny company may, on its own, refuse to do business with another firm, but an agreement among competitors not to do business with targeted individuals or businesses may be an illegal boycott, especially if the group of competitors working together has market power.News and Events Show/hide News and Events menu items.Advice and Guidance Show/hide Advice and Guidance menu items.Competition and Consumer Protection Guidance Documents.Enforcement Show/hide Enforcement menu items.The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements. To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data.
#Boycott advance auto parts free#
If you are not interested in AAP anymore, you can use our free platform to see our list of stocks with Return on Equity over 20%. I recommend you do additional fundamental analysis by looking through our most recent infographic report on Advance Auto Parts to help you make a more informed investment decision. Since its high ROE is not likely driven by high debt, it might be a good time to top up on your current holdings if your fundamental research reaffirms this analysis.Īre you a potential investor? If you are considering investing in AAP, looking at ROE on its own is not enough to make a well-informed decision. NYSE:AAP Historical Debt Oct 5th 17 What this means for you:Īre you a shareholder? Even though AAP returned below the industry average, its ROE comes in excess of its cost of equity.
0 kommentar(er)
